![]() ![]() In my book I make the case that it's the comic book equivalent of T.S. in fact, when I did my little guest spot at Comics Should Be Good recently, I mentioned in my introduction that my book dealt with the "much maligned 'Arkham Asylum,'" and one of the commentators said, "Much maligned? I've never heard of 'Arkham Asylum' being much maligned." And to me, it's totally maligned!īut I do think "Arkham Asylum" has a lot to offer. ![]() Because of when "Arkham Asylum" was released and because of its reputation. I mean it's hard to find "Wow, I just love 'Arkham Asylum!'" Would you say that the book is misunderstood, generally? "The Filth" is obviously difficult for people to understand, but I think because Batman is in "Arkham Asylum," it's more misunderstood by more people. You detail really masterfully all the symbols, allusions and other references to be found in "Arkham Asylum," which I think you could say is probably the most unpopular Morrison work despite its actually being very successful in terms of sales. It's tremendously useful to me, as someone who since basically childhood has been trying to make sense of this book. Your book provides Morrison fans (and detractors) with what is easily the most complete analysis of "Arkham Asylum" I've ever seen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |